* Explanation:
There is no communication between the LAN networks 193.60.60.0/26 (Router1) and 193.60.60.128/26 (Router2) because this internet hasn't converged and won't, as long as you keep using a classful routing protocol, which is RIPv1 in this case.
The key point to understand is that RIPv1 doesn't converge on discontiguous network topologies because it is a classful routing protocol, and thus it doesn't send the subnet masks as part of its routing updates. Here you have subnets 193.60.60.0/26 and 193.60.60.128/26 separated by network 192.168.0.0/26. This makes 193.60.60.x a discontiguous network.
If you take a look at the routing tables of both Router1 and Router2, you'll see neither of them shows that they can reach the remote 193.60.60.x/26 subnet via its neighbor router, so there is no communication beyond each local network, except reaching its own router's interfaces.
About your question in the Additional Details section, you see the "Destination Host Unreachable" ICMP message from Router2 because, as we just said in the previous paragraph, its routing table doesn't contain an entry (path) to reach the remote network 193.60.60.0/26. This is assuming you tried to ping the FastEthernet interface (193.60.60.1). Now, if you try to ping Router1's Serial interface, you'll only get a timeout as Router1 doesn't have a route back to the remote network (193.60.60.128/26) to send the ICMP echo reply message (the "ping answer").
* Possible solutions? Just choose one:
. . . 1. Use a classless routing protocol, such as RIPv2, EIGRP or OSPF, instead of the classful RIPv1.
. . . 2. If you still want to use RIPv1, then don't use discontiguous networks. In this case, keep both subnets 193.60.60.x connected to the same router and make sure you're still using the same subnet mask for both subnets.
. . . 3. While still keeping RIPv1, replace one of the two 193.60.60.x subnets with another major network (A, B, C) address. Just make sure you don't separate the subnets from the same router, that is, make sure you don't use discontiguous networks.
* Notes:
. . . @Harold, this topology is not affected by the use of Ethernet switches (unless certain specific configuration is made). A new out-of-the-box Cisco switch does its primary job very well without any initial configuration, and the same applies here if the asker just selected them from the selection box of Packet Tracer.