Daktyl
2012-04-15 22:43:06 UTC
Effectively this would give one computer the ability to send data packets simultaneously through the 2 (or more) adapters (each with it's own bandwidth allotments), instead of in order through one, essentially doubling your bandwidth.
More information here:http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=Arg8Rn.oyJ8jd.aCzNpKSlnsy6IX;_ylv=3?qid=20120415210717AAxvoiJ
I was meaning for this to apply to multiple network connections as well, not just simultaneous connections to one network.
I was met with disappointing answers (though I didn't expect much on the Windows end in the first place). I noticed, however, that the answers essentially point to the fact that THE COMPUTER ITSELF cannot correctly handle more than one connection.
This set me to thinking: While Window's and Mac's networking software is HIGHLY proprietary, the Linux network-manager program in completely open. And I value the freedom it provides.
Finally the question: Is it not possible to add such code to network-manager, or to rewrite a new program entirely, that would allow your computer to utilize multiple connections, each with their own addresses, DNS servers, and most importantly bandwidth allotments.
I am not sure if what I am talking about is "load balancing" as somebody suggested on my previous question. I do not think so, as his concept requires the same IP/MAC address for all connections.
If that could be achieved, why not add code that allows full control over which connection is used for which purpose/programs?
I understand this is complicated code, and that it wouldn't have been written before due to the possible strain and complications on the computers because of their limited ability. However, most computers now should be able to handle this type of program in the background, without affecting performance (especially on Linux).